World

House Passes $196 Billion Social Security Bill: Will Repealing Pension Reductions Shorten The Program’s Lifespan?

House Passes $196 Billion Social Security Bill: Will Repealing Pension Reductions Shorten The Program’s Lifespan?

On Nov. 12, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Social Security Fairness Act, a bipartisan bill set in motion to eliminate two long-standing provisions that currently reduce Social Security benefits for public sector employees.

The legislation was first introduced in 2023 and will now head to the Senate, where it has strong bipartisan support. If passed, it is estimated to cost $196 billion over the next decade. Critics worry that enacting this bill could further exacerbate Social Security’s funding challenges.

Don’t Miss:

The bill addresses two key provisions – added to the Social Security Act in 1983 – that affect public sector workers:

  1. The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP): This rule reduces Social Security benefits for individuals who receive pensions from jobs where they didn’t pay Social Security taxes, like certain state and local government positions. According to the Congressional Research Service, about 2.1 million people are affected by this provision.

  2. The Government Pension Offset (GPO): The GPO reduces Social Security benefits for spouses, widows and widowers who receive government pensions. About 745,000 individuals currently receive reduced benefits under this provision.

Those in support of repealing these rules argue that they unfairly penalize retired teachers, police officers, firefighters and other public servants, many of whom heavily rely on their Social Security and pension benefits for their income.

See Also: I’m 62 Years Old And Have $1.2 Million Saved. Is This Enough to Retire Stress-Free?

Proponents of the bill see it as a victory for equity. Representative Garret Graves (R-La.), a coleader of the bill, stated on the House floor, “This has been 40 years of treating people differently, discriminating against a certain set of workers.”

The National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare called the House vote a “bipartisan victory” for public employees and their families.

While the bill aims to address disparities among a demographic affected for over 40 years, critics are concerned that enacting it could further strain Social Security’s already depleting finances.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button